School
8/16/08
Hoover University
does not have a beautiful, idyllic campus. There is some pleasant landscaping
and a slender clock tower that stretches two-hundred feet into the sky, but for
the most part it’s a nondescript environment. All the buildings are utilitarian
and brick, flat-roofed, with sterile insides and windowless classrooms. There
are kids riding their bikes, walking around with headsets, moving in great
crowds like the migratory herds of African megafauna. I fade in and march with
the stream, flowing down the main strip, heading toward the Victor B. Tooms Liberal
Arts Center,
a hulking rectangular structure. There is a mulberry tree near the entrance,
and a stick-limbed boy with disheveled hair is reaching into the branches,
plucking berries and tossing them into his mouth. He sees me staring and nods,
murmuring to himself. His lips are purplish-red, and he’s gotten stains all
over the collar of his yellow-green soccer shirt. His backpack is tiny and
pink, like a little girl’s. I want to punch him in the throat, but the odds
aren’t with me, so I walk past and enter the Tooms building. My classroom is
the first door on the right. I sit down at a desk and stare at the diminutive
form of Peter Gibbons, professor of Creative Writing extraordinaire, AKA the Great Communicator, a friend to
students, a lover of discussion and its inherent chaos.
“Hey
Leona!” he says. We are the only people in the classroom. “I think, uuh, I’m
afraid we may have an issue.” Professor Gibbons has a nasal voice, thick beard,
and wide-rimmed glasses. He’s dressed in black jeans and a black turtle neck, looking
quite the poet, I must say.
“What
do you mean?” I ask in my most innocent voice.
“Apparently
you, uumm, assaulted Chad Arroyo outside of class yesterday. I found him
gasping for breath and holding his throat. He wrote your name on a piece of
paper.”
“That’s
odd,” I reply. “I don’t recall punching Chad, and I don’t really understand
why anyone would want to.”
“Come
on, you, uuuhh, you have to admit that you and Chad don’t agree on much, and your
disagreements are rarely civil,” he says, his eyebrows arching. Gibbons is a
frequent devotee of the filled pause, a curious habit, I guess, for a
professor.
“Can
you see me hitting anyone?” I ask, showing him my tiny fists. “These are
women’s hands. I can rarely find gloves that fit them. They aren’t made for
fighting.”
“Leona,
I can’t, uuuhhh, verify this incident, but I feel like you should resolve your differences
with Chad
before the situation, you know, escalates.”
“Let
me ask you something: did anybody see me hit Chad? Were there any witnesses?
Where’s the evidence, I guess, is what I’m saying.”
Professor
Gibbons shakes his head, his shoulders rising spastically. I can tell he
doesn’t believe me, but other students have entered the classroom. He doesn’t
have anything on me, just a scrawled name, and I’m not about to confess to hurting
Chad Arroyo, who walks in and takes the seat right next to mine. He’s looking
at me, trying to bore a hole through my head, but I open my notebook and begin
to mindlessly doodle. “Leona,” he
whispers. A featureless face has taken nascent form on the paper before me, a
great head with owl-like eyes. “Hey, hey!
Excuse me!” says Chad.
I give the thing a bloated torso and stubby limbs. Its eyes are disquieting.
They are dream eyes, eyes that stare out from blackness, empty and cold. They
say things to me, things I can’t recall while conscious. A hand appears on my
desk, fleshy, covered in fine hairs. It is a well-manicured hand, one that does
not know hard labor, and once again a violent urge seizes me and I almost stab
it with my pencil.
“What
do you need, Chadwick?” I ask, still working on my drawing.
“Can
you look at me while I’m talking to you?” he says.
“I
would rather not,” I reply.
“Why
did you hit me yesterday?” he asks.
“You
must be mistaken,” I say. “I would never hit someone.”
“You
know, I could’ve reported you, and then you might have been expelled.”
I
look at Chad.
He’s short, oval-faced, his hair combed off to the right side of his head,
giving it an almost toupee appearance. His jeans are too tight, and he’s
wearing skateboard shoes with no laces and no socks.
“You’d
tell administration that you got beat up by a girl?” I say.
“I
didn’t get beat up. You punched me in the throat.”
“So
do something about it, you pussy,” I say, looking back at my drawing.
“Besides
report you? What do you mean, like hit you? You think I should’ve hit you?”
“Or
go tattle. Whatever. It doesn’t matter.”
“There’s
something wrong with you,” he says, moving to another desk.
“How is everybody today?” says Professor Gibbons, his
voice modulating upward. “What did everybody do over the weekend?” Gibbons always starts off class like this; he gets all
excited and energetic, like he feeds off of sunny vibes and reckless youth, and
suddenly the ums and uhs vanish, and his sentences rattle off
like machine gun fire.
“I
played the new Fallout and kind of
forgot about life,” says Dexter, last name unknown, some starched shirt
wearing, long-legged, wannabe poet.
“Me
and my sorority sisters went up to Chicago and ate pizza and hit the bars and
visited family, and like, totally drank too much, and, you know, had like a
great time!” says Roxanne, clad in pink sweats, hair in a bun, her eyes too far
apart.
“Fuckin’
A,” says Chad.
“To
be young. Yes, the exciting
adventures of youth! Language, though, Chad,” says Gibbons.
“There’s
some dude eating berries off of the tree by the doors,” says Chad. “Did
anybody see this weirdo?”
“Yeah,
that guy does that like every other day,” says Robert or Rupert, I can’t ever
remember. He’s a fat kid with an enormous toad-like head who always wears flip
flops no matter the weather. I loathe the sight of his pasty white feet,
large-nailed, soft and translucent.
“Let’s
talk about poetry!” yells Gibbons. “This is creative writing, remember?
Everyone get out a piece of paper and write twenty words. No thinking, just do
it.” This is a typical exercise, one that the prof likes to use about once a
week. He loves free-writing, just absolutely adores it; I am fairly certain
that if given the option, he would spend his days vomiting out onto the page
one disparate sentence after another, the end result being a pretentious mess
of incomprehensible nonsense.
“Chad, read what
you wrote,” says Gibbons.
“Punk hardcore twee remodifier, twisted at
the hip, nailed to the cross, cigarette in the pocket: I’m blessed. Love: Mom.”
“Yeah,
that’s good, yeah, uuummm, excellent!” says Gibbons. “This is what I tell you
people: you don’t have to labor over art. You don’t have to rack your brain and
cut off your ear. I mean, that might help—passion’s great and all—but the
amount of time spent on a piece doesn’t necessarily ensure its quality. It’s
subjective, of course, what exactly constitutes great art. People have wildly
differing opinions. Britney Spears and the Beatles, you know, which is better?
I have my opinion and you have yours.”
“But
my opinion’s the best,” I say.
“How
is it the best?” asks Chad.
“Well,
you like Radiohead, for instance, as everyone here well knows. I can give you a
million reasons why they suck. Thom York looks like a sleepy-eyed gnome, and he
caterwauls to no end, and after Ok
Computer they started putting out tuneless nonsense. Kid A sounded like B-sides married to Aphex Twin drum beats. They
don’t play their guitars much anymore. Thom exchanged them for Pro Tools.”
“Leona,
would you please…” begins Gibbons.
“And
the Beatles are objectively better than Britney Spears, who came from the
Mickey Mouse Club and MTV, and who had like a billion songwriters working side
by side with marketers trying to figure out how best to sell her sex appeal to
adolescents and make her record company millions. She can’t sing, she can’t
write, he’s just hot,” I finish, not knowing why I’m so agitated.
“The
Beatles are overrated,” says Robert/Rupert.
“I’ve
never been too fond of them,” responds Dexter.
“The
Velvet Underground are the indie Beatles,” states Chad.
“So
what you’re saying is that her art lacks integrity,” says Gibbons. “Is that
right, Leona?”
“Yeah,
I guess,” I say.
“And you don’t think the Beatles made music
for money?”
“Well,
no, I know they did, but they wrote their own stuff and played their own
instruments,” I reply.
“So
all music must be written by performers in order to be good?” asks Gibbons.
“No,”
I say, while knowing where he’s going with this.
“When
you have a piece of art, you divorce it from its creator and the creator’s
intentions,” says Gibbons. “You judge it on its own merits.”
“Why
can’t you have criteria for judging art?” I ask. The rest of the class sighs;
they’re tired of my arguing and my contrarian disposition. I don’t particularly
care.
“A
good piece of art is successful in doing whatever it was created to do. By that
criterion, Womanizer is a fine song.
You, Leona, obviously have your own criteria by which you judge art. Is your
opinion better than mine? Who decides? Writing music or poetry isn’t like
building a bridge or solving an equation. Do you understand what I’m getting
at?” asks Gibbons.
“Maybe
you should be a math major,” suggests Chad.
“Maybe
you should stop wearing women’s jeans,” I say.
“Okay,
discussion time has ended,” says Gibbons. I listen to his lecture for a while,
but I soon start to drift into the hazy netherworld of the daydream. Doodles
fill my notebook, surrealistic creatures and geometric shapes. I manage to draw
a decent caricature of Diesel, his head a football-shaped moon, saliva dripping
from his yawning maw. Most of the class is paying attention except for a boy in
a green army jacket. He always wears a Stetson hat with a turkey feather
emerging from the band, and he has this hat pulled down low; his hand moves
fast over a notebook, a large hand with big knuckles and protruding veins. He
could be drawing the same things that I am—maybe he even has a brother named
after a type of engine. I read an article the other day that suggested it was
possible and maybe even probable that we are all living in a simulation based
on mathematical laws. Like, there’s some advanced posthuman civilization that
decides to simulate life using unimaginably powerful computers. Since simulating
the entire universe on an atomic level would require an infinite amount of
energy, it is reasonable to assume that they would look to conserve resources,
hence, this could all be a show put on for my benefit. Professor Gibbons, Chad, Stetson
hat guy, they’re all shadow people, zombies, and if I go and look at Stetson
guy’s notebook, drawings will magically appear. A connection will be forged on
the basis of randomly generated data. Of course, maybe I’m the shadow person.
Maybe I don’t have thoughts. Maybe this is the first second of my life, and as
soon as I walk out of this classroom, I shall cease to be.
The
rustling of papers disturbs my reverie. I hear the tail-end of a sentence from
Gibbons mentioning that there will be a quiz on Wednesday, which is
interesting, since we never have quizzes. I look around to ask someone what he
said, but there’s no one sitting next to me.
Arroyo
flicks a wad of paper at me as he gets up for the door. It hits me in the tits.
I unroll it and discover a ten digit code that I presume to be a phone number.
Instead of throwing it in the garbage, I stuff the paper in my pocket.
“Leona,”
says Gibbons as I prepare to leave.
“What,”
I say.
“We
can’t have these frequent, um, distractions every, uuuhhh, class. I know you
have strong views on, uuumm, art, but we can’t rehash the same conversation.
I’d appreciate it if you kept that in mind.”
“What
are we having a quiz over?” I ask, figuring I can’t fall any lower in Gibbons’
eyes.
“Stalin’s Mustache,” he says, looking at
me shrewdly from behind his thick frames. The aforementioned volume is a
two-hundred page collection of poems written by the prof about, you guessed it,
Joseph Stalin’s facial hair.
“Any
particular poem I should read over?” I ask.
“Just
read as many as you can,” says Gibbons.
“Sure,”
I replying, wondering how many cups of spiked coffee that will take.
…
I’m
sorry to do this to you, dear reader, but I have to insert one of Gibbons’
poems. You need to suffer as I did. Imagine reading a small novel of this
stuff.
Stalin’s
Mustache: An Affirmation
It wasn’t unexpected, you furry wet leach,
that your sexy shimmering shaking would lead to something of an affair, which,
now don’t get me wrong, brotha (reduced to the vernacular, yet again) I enjoyed
as much as a man/boy/woman/transvestite could, especially when considering the
rather fecal circumstances that you are undoubtedly loath to remember, seeing
how you shat spanked cummed your way through the interview, filthy hobo that
you are, you dirty girl/boy/baby, you ridiculous fat swine, you smelly
flee-bitten poopy-eared Commie, you hairy twat, you stinky taint, you delicate
beautiful busty whore, I really, really, really, really want to
forget/preserve/consume/digest you, but alas, the Dictator prevents it, he is
always getting in the way of our bristly porcine love, and I like to think that
some day, you and I shall walk together, man and mustache, hand in hand, foot
in mouth, genitals joined in whiskery abandon.
No comments:
Post a Comment